ArticleScientific reports2025
Acute myeloid leukemia risk stratification in younger and older patients through transcriptomic machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Article
- Hematopoietic Aging and Leukemia: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disease that can develop at any age. While AML incidence increases with age and distinct genetic alterations are observed in younger versus older patients, current classification systems do not incorporate age as a defining factor. In this study, we analyzed RNA-seq data from 404 AML patients at initial diagnosis, leveraging a k-mer-based machine learning approach to uncover age-related transcriptomic differences in favorable and adverse risk groups. Our model achieved over 90% accuracy in risk prediction and identified key gene signatures distinguishing ELN2017 favorable and adverse groups. From these signatures, we selected prognostic biomarkers with significant impacts on survival. Additionally, we explored the biological context underlying transcriptomic complexity across age groups, revealing distinct tumor profiles and differences in immune and stromal cell populations, particularly in older patients. These findings underscore the importance of age-related molecular features in AML and provide new insights for risk stratification and therapeutic targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.