ArticleScientific reports2025
Mathematical modeling of heart rate tracking in motion affected PPG signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart rate tracking using Photoplethysmography (PPG) suffers from motion artifacts, which can change signal structure in a way that the spectral peak due to motion artifacts (MAs) can mask the actual peak related to the heart rate. To handle the problem just mentioned, a novel mathematical model for heart rate (HR) tracking is introduced. Our technique is based on a mathematical model for a multichannel PPG. The model uses a fixed-resolution spectrum of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Chirplet Z Transform (CZT) spectra at various resolutions, confinement of spectral space, previous heart rate, range of the signal, and a golden seed (GS) algorithm to generate the next heart rate. GS algorithm is a novel technique which is introduced to handle the masking of spectral peaks related to HRs. The GS algorithm utilizes intensity profiling, the Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) algorithm, spectral multiplication and subtraction, and proximity clustering to enhance the masked peak. The average time taken by our technique is 21.21ms and a mean average error of 2.12 on the IEEE signal processing Cup 2015 makes it fit for the real-time applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.