Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable ensemble remaining useful life prediction enables dynamic maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines.

Hikmetcan Özcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hikmetcan ÖzcanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Campus, Kocaeli, 41380, Kocaeli, Türkiye. hikmetcan.ozcan@kocaeli.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a predictive-maintenance framework for aircraft engines that integrates accurate remaining-useful-life (RUL) estimation with a cost-aware scheduling strategy. The predictive layer employs ensemble learning by combining LightGBM, CatBoost, and Gradient Boosting, thereby enhancing both accuracy and stability. The scheduling layer initiates maintenance once the predicted RUL falls below a tunable threshold τ (set to 15 cycles in experiments) and allocates service slots under cost and risk tolerance constraints, ensuring flexibility for conservative operation when necessary. The framework is evaluated on the NASA C-MAPSS dataset (FD001-FD004), covering single- and multi-condition as well as single- and multi-fault scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate strong performance on FD001 and FD003, with competitive results on FD002 and FD004. For instance, the LightGBM+CatBoost ensemble achieves RMSE = 6.62 and RUL Score = [Formula: see text] on FD001, while the three-model ensemble yields RMSE = 9.71 and RUL Score = [Formula: see text] on FD003. To ensure transparency and reliability, SHAP-based interpretability analysis is applied, highlighting critical sensors and operational cycles. The ensemble approach provides more balanced attributions, which enhances auditability and supports engineering validation in safety-critical domains. Overall, this study contributes to aviation predictive maintenance by delivering robust and interpretable RUL predictions and by translating them into tunable maintenance policies; however, these contributions are demonstrated on C-MAPSS and with a fixed illustrative threshold, so the reported gains should be interpreted as benchmark-specific until confirmed on real fleets and under alternative risk-aware policies.

Indexed as

Aircraft EnginesDynamic Maintenance SchedulingHybrid Ensemble ModelsPredictive MaintenanceRemaining Useful Life Prediction

Identifiers

PMID41233439
PMCPMC12615660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.