ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between modified Rankin Scale scores and fall risk in post-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perforator-Aware Explainable Microsurgical Intelligence for Basilar Trunk Aneurysm Reconstruction: A Human-Centred Clinical AI Framework for Precision Neurovascular Surgery-A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Function Through Spasticity Reduction-Effects of Botulinum Toxin A After Stroke: A Prospective Before-After Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The multi-target protective effects of quercetin in cerebrovascular diseases: a dietary strategy for endothelial repair and neuroprotection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls are among the most common complications after stroke, potentially delaying functional recovery. Although the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is widely used in stroke assessment, its relationship with fall risk remains poorly understood. The study aims to identify the association between mRS scores and fall risk in stroke patients. In this multicenter cross-sectional study, data on sociodemographics, clinical factors, fall characteristics, and mRS scores were collected via face-to-face interviews. Univariate analysis, binary logistic regression, and threshold effect models were employed to examine the association between fall risk and mRS scores. Among 6,192 enrolled patients, 524 (8.46%) experienced falls. The mRS showed a non-linear association with fall risk, peaking at mRS = 3 (P < 0.05). For scores < 3, each 1-point increase in mRS raised fall risk by 34% (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09- 1.60, P = 0.0046), whereas for scores > 3, each 1-point increase reduced risk by 26% (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.90, P = 0.0027). An inverted U-shaped relationship exists between mRS scores and fall risk, peaking at an mRS score of 3, identifying a potential priority group for fall prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.