Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233400›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An assessment of the relation between narrative productivity, subjectivity expression, emotion description, and ToM abilities in healthy aging.

Elena Gallo, Francesca Marina Bosco, Andrea Marini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena GalloCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Udine, Via Margreth, 3-33100, Udine, Italy.
Francesca Marina BoscoDepartment of Psychology, GIPSI Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. francesca.bosco@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6101-8587
Andrea MariniCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Udine, Via Margreth, 3-33100, Udine, Italy. andrea.marini@uniud.it.

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca G53D23003110006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narrative discourse production is among the most important aspects of human communication. This study focuses on the impact of healthy aging on three major aspects of narrative production: productivity skills (in terms of words produced, speech rate, and % of informative words), the use of subjectivity markers (i.e., in our study those adjectives and adverbs that signal the narrator's personal stance, emotions, evaluations, or perspective), and the spontaneous tendency to describe emotions during storytelling. We also investigated the relationship between these three features of narrative production and Theory of Mind skills within the context of the effects of healthy aging on these measures. Ninety participants were divided into three age groups: young adults, older adults, and senior-old adults. Their speech samples were analyzed using a multilevel discourse analysis. Among subjectivity markers, older adults produced more modalizers (i.e., adjective and adverbs reflecting the speaker's evaluation about the degree of certainty or doubt of what is being told) than younger participants. In contrast, the use of emotion descriptors significantly dropped in senior-old adults. Furthermore, performance on Theory of Mind tasks correlated with the spontaneous tendency to describe emotions and produce informative words during storytelling but not with the production of subjectivity markers.

Indexed as

EmotionsHealthy AgingNarrationTheory of MindAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeechYoung AdultEmotion descriptionHealthy agingNarrative productionSubjectivity markersTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID41233400
PMCPMC12615809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.