ArticleScientific reports2025
An assessment of the relation between narrative productivity, subjectivity expression, emotion description, and ToM abilities in healthy aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Pragmatic Communication in Healthy Aging: A Preliminary Investigation of the Long-Term Effects of the Advanced Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Narrative discourse production is among the most important aspects of human communication. This study focuses on the impact of healthy aging on three major aspects of narrative production: productivity skills (in terms of words produced, speech rate, and % of informative words), the use of subjectivity markers (i.e., in our study those adjectives and adverbs that signal the narrator's personal stance, emotions, evaluations, or perspective), and the spontaneous tendency to describe emotions during storytelling. We also investigated the relationship between these three features of narrative production and Theory of Mind skills within the context of the effects of healthy aging on these measures. Ninety participants were divided into three age groups: young adults, older adults, and senior-old adults. Their speech samples were analyzed using a multilevel discourse analysis. Among subjectivity markers, older adults produced more modalizers (i.e., adjective and adverbs reflecting the speaker's evaluation about the degree of certainty or doubt of what is being told) than younger participants. In contrast, the use of emotion descriptors significantly dropped in senior-old adults. Furthermore, performance on Theory of Mind tasks correlated with the spontaneous tendency to describe emotions and produce informative words during storytelling but not with the production of subjectivity markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.