Trial reportScientific reports2025
Intraoperative hypotension after remimazolam or propofol induction with sevoflurane maintenance in angiotensin II receptor blockers-treated patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06093971 (Remimazolam Versus Propofol for General Anesthesia Induction in Patients on Renin-angiotensin System Blockers Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Remimazolam Versus Propofol for General Anesthesia Induction in Patients on Renin-angiotensin System Blockers Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is associated with hemodynamic shifts; patients on angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are especially susceptible to intraoperative hypotension. We investigated whether induction with remimazolam reduces the intraoperative hypotension incidence and severity compared with propofol in this population. Herein, 112 hypertensive patients undergoing RALP who continued ARB therapy received remimazolam (0.2 mg/kg) or propofol (1-1.5 mg/kg) for anesthetic induction. The primary endpoint was hypotension occurrence (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 65 mmHg sustained for ≥ 1 min), assessed during the entire anesthesia and 15 min post-induction. Secondary endpoints included MAP < 55 mmHg sustained for ≥ 1 min, time-weighted average (TWA)-MAP < 65 mmHg or < 55 mmHg, duration of MAP < 65 mmHg, and required norepinephrine dose. The hypotension incidence did not differ significantly between groups during the entire anesthesia (87.5% vs. 89.3%, P > 0.999). During the entire anesthesia, no significant between-group differences were observed for MAP < 55 mmHg for ≥ 1 min, TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg or < 55 mmHg, duration of MAP < 65 mmHg, and required norepinephrine dose. Similarly, no significant between-group differences were observed during the 15 min after induction. Induction with remimazolam did not reduce intraoperative hypotension risk compared with low-dose propofol in patients undergoing RALP who continued ARB therapy.Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06093971, 23/10/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.