ArticleScientific reports2025
Using machine learning to predict student outcomes for early intervention and formative assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Privacy-preserving federated learning for interpretable student at-risk prediction across schools.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing importance of early prediction of student performance has led to research into machine learning models that can be used to assess student outcomes more accurately.This study focused on developing a predictive model based on machine learning algorithms to evaluate student performance and provide early intervention mechanisms. Create a new predictive model using machine learning algorithms to assess student performance and identify the key variables that influence success. The proposed model aims to serve as an early warning system to detect potential academic failures and suggest interventions. A questionnaire was developed to collect data from the students. Four machine learning algorithms, C5.0, CART, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest, were used to analyze the data. The effectiveness of each algorithm was evaluated with a focus on performance accuracy. Among the four algorithms, Random Forest achieved the most consistent results in the cross-validation metrics. However, C5.0 provided higher accuracy on the test set and CART showed the highest training performance, indicating performance conflicts, which are analyzed in more detail in the Discussion section. Based on these findings, a new classification model is proposed that includes the most important variables that significantly influence student success. This model was developed to detect academic failure at an early stage and enable timely intervention. The proposed predictive model provides a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk students and can support formative assessments. By identifying students who are likely to fail, the model provides opportunities for interventions to improve their academic outcomes. It is expected to help educators respond more effectively to student needs, ensure equity in the classroom, and provide cost-effective solutions for education policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.