ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantitative characterization of cracking and debonding behaviors of sandstone containing an inverted U-shaped inclusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To better investigate the reinforcement effect of inclusions on inverted U-shaped openings, sandstone specimens with an U-shaped opening were fabracation, considering two cases of filled and unfilled opening. Uniaxial compressive tests combined with digital image correlation (DIC) monitoring were performed on these specimens. Three quantitative methods were introduced to decipher DIC measurements. The inclusion has a significant effect on enhancing the strength and elastic modulus of the specimens but cannot change the ultimate failure mode. The strain distribution around the opening was analyzed by extracting the strain data. The presence of inclusions changes the strain distribution and reduces the concentration level, thereby causing a change in the crack initiation position and a reduction in the crack initiation stress. The change rate of variance (CROV) was proposed to describe the strain field evolution quantitatively, which is found to exhibit abnormal features in response to cracking events. The alteration in the cracking process caused by the inclusion changes this response feature, and the first cusp in CROV associated with crack initiation is defined as the precursor point. A novel approach was used to reveal the debonding mechanism between rock and inclusions. The relative opening zones are concentrated around the sidewalls, and the relative squeezing zones are located at the opening top and bottom. The crack initiates from the relative opening zone and, in turn, changes the initiation area from the relative opening state into the relative squeezing state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.