ArticleScientific reports2025
Combining K-fold cross validation with bayesian hyperparameter optimization for accuracy enhancement of land cover and land use classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compressive strength of mortar incorporating recycled nonmetallic printed circuit board waste: experimental and interpretable machine learning analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based individualized prediction: risk assessment of retinopathy in preterm infants at high altitude.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land cover and land use (LCLU) information is crucial in different earth observation applications, such as environmental management, infrastructure planning, and urban development. Recently, deep learning has emerged as an effective technique for image processing and spatial analysis, with excellent accuracies in image classification. However, training deep learning models for LCLU classification using remote sensing data continues to be challenging. One of the main challenges when using deep learning techniques for remote sensing classification is determining the optimized hyperparameters. Bayesian hyperparameter optimization is considered to be one of the most effective methods for determining optimized hyperparameters. Therefore, this method was applied to find the optimal learning rate, gradient clipping threshold and dropout rate for ResNet18 model. Using these optimized hyperparameters to classify EuroSat dataset, the model's overall accuracy was 94.19%. To improve the exploration of the search space for better learning rate, gradient clipping threshold, and dropout rate hyperparameters, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization was combined with K-fold cross validation. The ResNet18 model achieved 96.33% overall accuracy for classifying EuroSat dataset when using the hyperparameters obtained by this process. This improvement in overall accuracy demonstrates the effectiveness of combining Bayesian hyperparameter optimization with K-fold cross validation as an enhanced technique for finding optimized hyperparameters in remote sensing LCLU classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.