Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233377›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Combining K-fold cross validation with bayesian hyperparameter optimization for accuracy enhancement of land cover and land use classification.

Pooya Heidari, Asghar Milan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pooya HeidariFaculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. pooya.hdy@gmail.com.
Asghar MilanFaculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land cover and land use (LCLU) information is crucial in different earth observation applications, such as environmental management, infrastructure planning, and urban development. Recently, deep learning has emerged as an effective technique for image processing and spatial analysis, with excellent accuracies in image classification. However, training deep learning models for LCLU classification using remote sensing data continues to be challenging. One of the main challenges when using deep learning techniques for remote sensing classification is determining the optimized hyperparameters. Bayesian hyperparameter optimization is considered to be one of the most effective methods for determining optimized hyperparameters. Therefore, this method was applied to find the optimal learning rate, gradient clipping threshold and dropout rate for ResNet18 model. Using these optimized hyperparameters to classify EuroSat dataset, the model's overall accuracy was 94.19%. To improve the exploration of the search space for better learning rate, gradient clipping threshold, and dropout rate hyperparameters, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization was combined with K-fold cross validation. The ResNet18 model achieved 96.33% overall accuracy for classifying EuroSat dataset when using the hyperparameters obtained by this process. This improvement in overall accuracy demonstrates the effectiveness of combining Bayesian hyperparameter optimization with K-fold cross validation as an enhanced technique for finding optimized hyperparameters in remote sensing LCLU classification.

Indexed as

Deep learningEuroSATImage classificationK-Fold cross validationLand cover and land useRemote sensing

Identifiers

PMID41233377
PMCPMC12615620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.