Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233355›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2025

Appendicitis.

Paulina Salminen, Jussi Haijanen, Peter C Minneci, Giana Hystad Davidson, Marja A Boermeester, Ed Livingston, Roland E Andersson, Kyoung Ho Lee, David Flum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Huge Mass Secondary to Acute Simple Appendicitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global Incidence of Appendectomy: A Population-Based Study of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paulina SalminenDepartment of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. paulina.salminen@tyks.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-9264
Jussi HaijanenDepartment of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-557X
Peter C MinneciNemours Surgical Outcomes Center and Department of Surgery, Nemours Children's Health, Delaware Valley, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Giana Hystad DavidsonDepartment of Surgery and Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marja A BoermeesterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ed LivingstonDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Roland E AnderssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kyoung Ho LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
David FlumDepartment of Surgery and Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appendix is a small, worm-like diverticulum of the caecum, potentially having a role in regulating intestinal microbiota and immunology. Inflammation of the appendix, acute appendicitis, is one of the most common reasons for acute abdominal pain in children and adults and surgical emergency visits worldwide. The pathophysiology of appendicitis is still poorly understood. During the past decade, evidence has overturned the long-lasting dogma that all appendicitis cases have a clinical course inevitably progressing to perforation and life-threatening peritonitis unless operated upon in a timely manner. Instead, this natural course occurs only in a smaller proportion of patients, for whom emergency appendectomy remains mandatory. Advances in diagnostic accuracy following utilization of clinical scoring systems and imaging has enabled more accurate pre-interventional assessment of appendicitis disease severity. While some patients still require urgent surgery, the majority can be treated successfully with antibiotics, and in some the disease has even been shown to resolve spontaneously. This has confirmed the notion of at least two different forms of appendicitis: non-perforating and perforating, often referred to as uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Unified definitions of these forms are still undergoing rigorous research and debate, hampering both comparison of different studies and the establishment of unified treatment guidelines. The current knowledge on the safe and effective outcomes of non-operative treatment alternatives has further underlined the need for standardized uniform definitions of appendicitis severity and assessment of the success of two fundamentally different treatment options.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAbdominal PainAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyChildHumansSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41233355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.