ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2025
Appendicitis.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Huge Mass Secondary to Acute Simple Appendicitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Integration of clinical information for identification of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis in children: a multicenter retrospective cohort study with external validation.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy of abdominal drainage in perforated appendicitis: a retrospective single-center study using AAST grading and inverse probability treatment weighting analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Appendicitis burden in Africa, 2010-2023: temporal trends, pandemic-era deviations, and projections to 2030.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Article
- Global Incidence of Appendectomy: A Population-Based Study of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Identification of Campylobactercoli as a key pathogen in Jinhua piglet diarrhea and its the probiotic control by Enterococcus faecium.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Acute appendicitis in geriatric population: a clinical and prognostic comparison of surgical intervention and conservative management.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Appendiceal abscess complicated by mechanical small-bowel obstruction: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Diagnostic challenges in pediatric appendicitis: a case of perforated appendicitis with secondary hepatic abscess.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of TAP and M-TAPA Blocks in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Review
- Postlaparoscopic appendectomy acute pain: identifying risk factors and building a clinical prediction model.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of single-center experience in ultrasound-guided puncture drainage for pediatric appendiceal abscess.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in acute appendicitis in children: a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital in Ningbo, China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The appendix is a small, worm-like diverticulum of the caecum, potentially having a role in regulating intestinal microbiota and immunology. Inflammation of the appendix, acute appendicitis, is one of the most common reasons for acute abdominal pain in children and adults and surgical emergency visits worldwide. The pathophysiology of appendicitis is still poorly understood. During the past decade, evidence has overturned the long-lasting dogma that all appendicitis cases have a clinical course inevitably progressing to perforation and life-threatening peritonitis unless operated upon in a timely manner. Instead, this natural course occurs only in a smaller proportion of patients, for whom emergency appendectomy remains mandatory. Advances in diagnostic accuracy following utilization of clinical scoring systems and imaging has enabled more accurate pre-interventional assessment of appendicitis disease severity. While some patients still require urgent surgery, the majority can be treated successfully with antibiotics, and in some the disease has even been shown to resolve spontaneously. This has confirmed the notion of at least two different forms of appendicitis: non-perforating and perforating, often referred to as uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Unified definitions of these forms are still undergoing rigorous research and debate, hampering both comparison of different studies and the establishment of unified treatment guidelines. The current knowledge on the safe and effective outcomes of non-operative treatment alternatives has further underlined the need for standardized uniform definitions of appendicitis severity and assessment of the success of two fundamentally different treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41233355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.