Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using ensemble learning for classifying artistic styles in traditional Chinese woodcuts.

Kun Li, Kim Chul-Soo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kun LiSchool of Art and Design, Weifang University of Science and Technology, 262700, Shouguang, China.
Kim Chul-SooSchool of Art and Design, Weifang University of Science and Technology, 262700, Shouguang, China. 450982795@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the oldest art fields, Chinese woodcut represent the rich history and culture of China, and have so far seen various artistic styles and diverse techniques. However, an automated method for identifying and classifying the artistic styles of these works has not yet been proposed. In this work, we propose a new method that consists of three main steps: The first step involves the compilation and preprocessing of the images of the woodblocks and their conversion into colored form to extract important features. The second step will use an ensemble model based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which allows for the prediction of the time period and artistic style of the works. In the third step, the predicted results from the basic models are combined with a regression tree-based meta-model Classification and Regression Tree (CART) to improve the prediction accuracy. This hybrid and multi-stage approach seeks to provide an efficient solution for the automatic identification and classification of Chinese woodcut and can contribute to scientific and applied advances in the field of Chinese art. The results of experiments conducted on our proposed method show remarkable success in achieving high levels of accuracy and precision in the identification and classification of Chinese woodcut. Specifically, this method has been able to achieve an accuracy increase of 4.7% and a precision increase level of 4%, which represent significant improvements compared to the compared methods. These results demonstrate the model's ability to more accurately and efficiently identify different artistic styles and time periods in woodcut.

Indexed as

Artistic stylesChinese woodcutClassification and regression treeConvolutional neural networkEnsemble learningStacked ensemble classification

Identifiers

PMID41233353
PMCPMC12615813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.