ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy2025
Immune imprinting toward SARS-CoV-2 XBB: implications for vaccine strategy and variant risk assessment.
Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Engineered HR1-Stem Helix-HR2 Trimeric Platform for Developing Broad-Spectrum Coronavirus Vaccines.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Immune Evasion: Mapping the Future of Vaccine Design.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- Utility of compartmental models to test the competing hypotheses of pathogen evolution and human intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The immune imprinting against SARS-CoV-2 subvariants that dynamically evolves through sequential vaccination and infection has been rarely studied. Using antigenic cartography and neutralizing antibody (NAb) profiling, we demonstrate that prototype-targeting vaccination followed by Delta/early Omicron breakthrough infections maintained dominant wild-type (WT)-focused immunity. However, XBB.1.5-adapted vaccination after BA.5 outbreaks shifted immune imprinting toward XBB.1.9.1, altering the antigenic landscape. NAb analysis revealed progressive WT-specific immunity enhancement through three-dose vaccination followed by BA.5 breakthrough infection (GMT: I-I = 35, I-I-I = 72, I-I-I-B5 = 807), followed by sharp decline after XBB reinfection (GMT: I-I-I-B5-XBB = 231), confirming XBB's antigenic divergence. To investigate the relationship between population immune dynamics and XBB infection risk following the BA.5/BF.7 wave, we analyzed the immune status of XBB breakthrough-infected and uninfected individuals from May to June 2023 (5-7 months post-wave). Utilizing an infection model calibrated to NAb titers against XBB.1.9.1, we estimated the 50% protective NAb titer against XBB infection to be 1:12.6. Retrospective analysis revealed that 80.3% of the population fell below this threshold in mid-2023, aligning with subsequent XBB resurgence. However, only 33.8% exhibited sub-protective JN.1 titers (<12.6) by August 2024, explaining the absence of JN.1-driven endemicity. This longitudinal study maps the immune imprint transitions from WT dominance to XBB adaptation, providing critical insights into vaccine strategy optimization and emerging variant risk assessment. The work highlights how iterative immune exposures reshape population protection landscapes against evolving coronaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.