ArticleBrain stimulation
Non-invasive temporal interference stimulation of the hippocampus suppresses epileptic biomarkers in patients with Epilepsy: biophysical differences between kilohertz and amplitude modulated stimulation.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Interference Stimulation Modulates Resting State Functional Connectivity of Motor Circuit in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Trial
- Personalized high-intensity temporal interference stimulation decouples cerebellar networks to enhance implicit learning.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- A patient-specific, 3D printed neurostimulator enabling focal transcranial electrical stimulation and EEG at home.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Integrating neural decoding, memristive materials, and adaptive control frameworks for next-generation hippocampal memory prosthetics.iScience · 2026Review
- Duration-dependent attenuation of nucleus accumbens synchronisation via noninvasive temporal interference.General psychiatry · 2026Article
- Enhancement of sleep slow wave activity using transcranial electrical stimulation with temporal interference: an interim analysis of the STRENGTHEN study.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Mechanisms, Applications, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017-2025: An update) - endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN).Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Ventral striatum temporal interference brain stimulation enhances the reward positivity event-related potential and reduces anxiety.Research square · 2026Article
- Safety assessment of temporal interference stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Brief Review of Architectures, Circuits, and Application Challenges.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Non-invasive neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a contemporary structured review of mechanisms, clinical evidence and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- From network hub to therapeutic target: the role of mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in epilepsy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Thalamic transcranial electrical stimulation with temporal interference enhances sleep spindle activity during a daytime nap.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Transcranial temporal interference stimulation of the thalamus in a patient with disorders of consciousness: a case report.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- TI-Toolbox: An Open-Source Software for Temporal Interference Stimulation Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Virtual brain twins for stimulation in epilepsy.Nature computational science · 2025Article
- Article
- Design of TI-TMS system for deep brain stimulation with higher focus in neural modulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Focal control of non-invasive deep brain stimulation using multipolar temporal interference.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMedication-refractory focal epilepsy creates a significant clinical challenge, with approximately 30 % of patients deemed ineligible for surgery due to involvement of eloquent cortical regions within the epileptogenic network. For these patients, electrical neuromodulation represents a promising alternative therapy. We investigated the potential of non-invasive temporal interference (TI) electrical stimulation in reducing epileptic biomarkers in patients with mesiotemporal epilepsy (MTLE) MATERIAL AND
methodThirteen patients implanted with stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) depth electrodes received TI stimulation with an amplitude modulation (AM) frequency of 130 Hz (Δf), delivered through either low-frequency (1 kHz + 1.13 kHz) or high-frequency (9 kHz + 9.13 kHz) carrier waves, specifically targeting the hippocampus-a common epileptic focus in MTLE. Intracerebral recordings before, during, and after TI stimulation were compared to recordings during sham stimulation at varying high-frequency (HF) carrier frequencies (1, 2, 5, and 9 kHz).
resultsTI stimulation resulted in a statistically significant decrease in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), particularly fast-ripples (FR), with prominent suppression observed in the hippocampal focus and reduced propagation brain-wide. In contrast, HF sham stimulation at 1 kHz frequency partially reduced cortical IED rates without effectively reaching the hippocampal focus. This cortical impact diminished progressively at higher sham frequencies (2, 5, and 9 kHz), exhibiting depth-dependent attenuation-a phenomenon not observed with TI stimulation, irrespective of carrier frequency. Additionally, TI stimulation demonstrated a significant carry-over effect, suppressing epileptic biomarkers beyond the stimulation period, which was not evident following kHz sham stimulation.
conclusionOur findings underscore the therapeutic potential of TI as a non-invasive brain stimulation modality for epilepsy, offering significant suppression of epileptic biomarkers through subthreshold modulation of the epileptogenic zone. Furthermore, this study highlights distinct biophysical differences between kilohertz-frequency stimulation and focal amplitude-modulated stimulation, supporting TI's unique utility in neuromodulation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.