Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41232372›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

A personalized prediction of longitudinal growth using People-Like-Me methods.

Xin Jin, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Stef van Buuren, Kathryn Colborn, Margaret Rosenfeld, Jeremy Graber, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin JinDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, CO, United States.
Elizabeth Juarez-ColungaDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, CO, United States; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, CO, United States. Electronic address: elizabeth.juarez-colunga@cuanschutz.edu.
Stef van BuurenDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Kathryn ColbornSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, CO, United States.
Margaret RosenfeldDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital in University of Washington, WA, United States.
Jeremy GraberDenver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, CO, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, CO, United States.
Jennifer Stevens-LapsleyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, CO, United States; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, CO, United States.

Funding

Modeling seizures in patients with focal epilepsyR01NS133040 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JACQUELINE A. FRENCH, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025692NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS133040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional prediction models typically emphasize overall trends, often missing the variability in individual responses, which limits their effectiveness for personalized predictions. The People-Like-Me (PLM) methodology was developed to address this issue by employing curve-matching techniques to generate individualized predictions. PLM is a data-driven algorithm that selects similar matching trajectories to estimate the trajectory for an out-of-sample target. In this study, we extend the PLM methods by introducing the Mahalanobis distance as a new metric for selecting matches, allowing for the consideration of correlations between time points in longitudinal data. We assess the performance of this enhanced PLM across various scenarios using clinical growth data from children with cystic fibrosis and simulated datasets. Our analysis compares (i) different match selection strategies, and (ii) PLM predictions with those from linear mixed models (LMM). The results consistently show that Mahalanobis-based PLM outperforms both the standard PLM and LMM. This establishes Mahalanobis-based PLM as a more accurate and flexible method for personalized prediction of longitudinal trajectories.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCystic FibrosisPrecision MedicineChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleBrokenstick modelChildren’s growthCurve matchingLongitudinal predictive methodsMahalanobis distance

Identifiers

PMID41232372
PMCPMC12668663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.