ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Developing a Status and Trends Assessment for Floating Kelp Canopies across Large Geographic Areas.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Historical data reveal extirpation of foundation species and kelp forest community deborealization in a coastal hotspot.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective kelp forest stewardship and management requires understanding of status and trends, but most kelp monitoring data streams on the U.S. West Coast are focused on subregional scales with outputs targeted toward a scientific audience. Here, we developed an index of kelp status and trend that integrates across thousands of kilometers and is presented as a simple, informative gauge that can be easily communicated to multiple audiences, including high-level policymakers. The indicator has three main features: (1) it is based on floating kelps as they create canopies, and managers indicated their interest in whether the quantity of kelp surface canopy had changed relative to historical levels. (2) Kelp canopy is assessed within segments along the coastline, rather than as a single coast-wide, cumulative amount. This approach retains local-level information allowing the indicator to be calculated at multiple scales, which accommodates the multigovernance landscape of the U.S. West Coast. (3) Status of kelp is expressed as a comparison to a reference period, established using all data prior to a marine heat wave in 2014 that led to substantial kelp losses. When applied to data from recent years, we found that the kelp canopies continue to be below their historical baseline. Since 2014, there has been no coast-wide recovery to reference levels. Still, despite 2023 being among the worst years on record, there was substantial improvement in kelp canopies in 2024 and recent downward trends have stalled. This Kelp Indicator provides a tool to inform resource management, improve policy, and prioritize scientific research, recovery efforts, and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.