Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41232108›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Developing a Status and Trends Assessment for Floating Kelp Canopies across Large Geographic Areas.

Christina A Frieder, Tom W Bell, Helen Berry, Kyle Cavanaugh, Danielle C Claar, Jan Freiwald, Benjamin Grime, Sara Hamilton, Henry F Houskeeper, Nicholas Lombardo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Historical data reveal extirpation of foundation species and kelp forest community deborealization in a coastal hotspot.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christina A FriederSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2056-3954
Tom W BellDepartment of Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States.
Helen BerryNearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington 98504, United States.
Kyle CavanaughDepartment of Geography, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
Danielle C ClaarNearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington 98504, United States.
Jan FreiwaldReef Check Foundation, Santa Cruz, California 95060, United States.
Benjamin GrimeThe Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, California 95811, United States.
Sara HamiltonThe Oregon Kelp Alliance, Port Orford, Oregon 97465, United States.
Henry F HouskeeperDepartment of Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5848-5440
Nicholas LombardoSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-2898-2577
Scott MarionMarine Resources Program, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Newport, Oregon 97365, United States.
Tristin Anoush McHughThe Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, California 95811, United States.
Gray McKennaNearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington 98504, United States.
P Ed ParnellScripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, California 92093, United States.
Pike SpectorCalifornia Ocean Protection Council, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-7727
Stephen B WeisbergSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective kelp forest stewardship and management requires understanding of status and trends, but most kelp monitoring data streams on the U.S. West Coast are focused on subregional scales with outputs targeted toward a scientific audience. Here, we developed an index of kelp status and trend that integrates across thousands of kilometers and is presented as a simple, informative gauge that can be easily communicated to multiple audiences, including high-level policymakers. The indicator has three main features: (1) it is based on floating kelps as they create canopies, and managers indicated their interest in whether the quantity of kelp surface canopy had changed relative to historical levels. (2) Kelp canopy is assessed within segments along the coastline, rather than as a single coast-wide, cumulative amount. This approach retains local-level information allowing the indicator to be calculated at multiple scales, which accommodates the multigovernance landscape of the U.S. West Coast. (3) Status of kelp is expressed as a comparison to a reference period, established using all data prior to a marine heat wave in 2014 that led to substantial kelp losses. When applied to data from recent years, we found that the kelp canopies continue to be below their historical baseline. Since 2014, there has been no coast-wide recovery to reference levels. Still, despite 2023 being among the worst years on record, there was substantial improvement in kelp canopies in 2024 and recent downward trends have stalled. This Kelp Indicator provides a tool to inform resource management, improve policy, and prioritize scientific research, recovery efforts, and monitoring.

Indexed as

KelpConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringUnited Statesbull kelpCalifornia Current Systemgiant kelpindicatorskelp canopyreport card

Identifiers

PMID41232108
PMCPMC12659428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.