Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41232097›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Embracing the Future of Medical Education With Large Language Model-Based Virtual Patients: Scoping Review.

Jianwen Zeng, Wenhao Qi, Shiying Shen, Xin Liu, Sixie Li, Bing Wang, Chaoqun Dong, Xiaohong Zhu, Yankai Shi, Xiajing Lou and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jianwen Zeng *School of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8324-5545
Wenhao Qi *School of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8409-8134
Shiying ShenSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0817-0719
Xin LiuSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2738-7674
Sixie LiSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7458-9761
Bing WangSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3441-9709
Chaoqun DongSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2615-0931
Xiaohong ZhuSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6060-8134
Yankai ShiSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4734-2192
Xiajing LouSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-7117
Bingsheng WangSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1143-7959
Jiani YaoSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3611-5532
Guowei JiangDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology and Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2164-4653
Qiong ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-5539
Shihua CaoSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, null, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9391-2345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, large language models (LLMs) have experienced rapid development. LLM-based virtual patients have begun to gain attention, offering new opportunities for simulations in medical education.

objectiveThis study aims to systematically analyze the current applications, research trends, and challenges of LLM-based virtual patients in medical education and to explore potential future directions for development.

methodsThis study adheres to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Five databases (Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, and Scopus) were searched from January 1, 2018, to June 24, 2025, to identify studies related to the application of LLM-based virtual patients in medical education. A comprehensive analysis of LLM-based virtual patients from research design to application and evaluation was conducted.

resultsA total of 28 studies were included in this scoping review. Analysis revealed that 92.9% (26/28) of the studies were published in the past 2 years, indicating that LLM-based virtual patient research is still in its early stages. The research primarily focuses on medical training and spans a wide range of medical disciplines. When using LLMs, advanced technologies such as social robots, virtual reality, and mixed reality are used to present LLM-based virtual patients. Combining these technologies with various supplementary tools enhances the realism of LLM-based virtual patients and improves user interaction. The evaluation of LLM-based virtual patients mainly emphasizes user experience. However, evaluation methods lack standardization, and only 13% (3/23) of studies used validated tools in assessing LLM-based virtual patients, while only 21.7% (5/23) of studies objectively measured learning outcomes facilitated by LLM-based virtual patients. All included studies expressed a positive attitude toward LLM-based virtual patients; however, they overlook privacy and security considerations in practical applications.

conclusionsLLM-based virtual patients hold significant innovation potential in medical education and are still in the early stages of development. They are primarily applied in medical training and show promise in communication skills training, although they cannot replace real-world interactions. Moreover, the heterogeneity of research designs, the absence of nonverbal cues in interactions, and concerns regarding privacy and security limit their broader implementation. Future research should focus on improving the reliability, realism, safety, and scientific efficacy of LLM-based virtual patients.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/DMC9Q; https://osf.io/DMC9Q/overview.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalLanguageHumansLarge Language ModelsVirtual Realityartificial intelligencelarge language modelmedical educationscoping reviewvirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID41232097
PMCPMC12661241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.