Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41232072›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Supporting Informed Vaccine Decision-Making and Communication in Pregnancy Through the Vaccines in Pregnancy Canada Intervention: Multimethod Co-Design Study.

Eliana Castillo, Andrea M Patey, Medea Myers-Stewart, Monica Santosh Surti, Maria Castrellon Pardo, Marcia Bruce, Zaileen Jamal, Madison Kennedy, Julie A Bettinger, Jessica Kaufman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eliana CastilloDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5548-8718
Andrea M PateyDepartment of Medicine, Quality and Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-4494
Medea Myers-StewartDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2972-3955
Monica Santosh SurtiDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-4902
Maria Castrellon PardoDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2216-9097
Marcia BruceDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8864-4964
Zaileen JamalDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1342-8426
Madison KennedyDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8637-4480
Julie A BettingerVaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-4174
Jessica KaufmanDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-4183
Margie DanchinDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-5691
Maoliosa DonaldDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-8361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination in pregnancy (VIP) protects pregnant individuals and their newborns; yet, uptake remains suboptimal. Pregnant individuals face unique decision-making challenges, and communication with their health care provider (HCP) is crucial for uptake. While there is extensive data on barriers to VIP, interventions applying evidence-based behavior change strategies and co-designed with end users are scarce. Our prior work indicated that a new Canadian intervention was needed.

objectiveThis study aimed to co-design a multicomponent intervention to support informed decision-making and vaccine communication in pregnancy.

methodsOur multimethod study followed the Double Diamond phases (ie, Discover, Define, Develop, and Deliver) and partnered with a diverse patient advisory council and a multidisciplinary team of HCPs. During the Discover and Define phases, our previous work, we explored gaps and barriers to VIP in Canada and defined the behavior change strategies to address those needs. During the Develop phase, we co-designed and conducted iterative prototyping of four intervention components: (1) a pregnancy-specific communication approach, (2) a skills course for HCPs, (3) a practice change plan, and (4) a website with evidence-based resources for patients and HCPs. We used online and in-person participatory co-design sessions and peer-to-peer, patient-oriented online focus groups and semistructured in-depth interviews. During the Deliver phase, we refined the intervention components through functionality and usability testing.

resultsThe Vaccines in Pregnancy Canada (VIP Canada) intervention consists of four integrated components: (1) DECIDE (Determine, Elicit, Consent, Interactive discussion, Deliver, and Empower): a patient-centered, pregnancy-specific communication approach for providers to deliver a clear vaccine recommendation while respecting autonomy. (2) Skills course for HCPs: 4 self-paced, online modules to learn the rationale for VIP and the DECIDE communication approach and 2 group sessions. Providers found the skills course clear, practical, and applicable across diverse clinical roles and settings. Feedback led to enhancements, including improved audio-visual synchronization, consistent closed captioning, and the addition of downloadable reference materials to support learning. (3) Practice change plan: an action plan HCPs make to integrate vaccine communication into their practice. (4) VIP Canada website: an evidence-based website with resources to support informed vaccine decision-making for patients and providers. Patient feedback informed iterative refinements to the layout and content of the website to enhance navigation, readability, and representation of diverse identities. Functionality and usability testing demonstrated that patients found the VIP Canada website visually appealing, easy to navigate, and supportive of informed decision-making.

conclusionsThe VIP Canada is a promising intervention co-designed to drive behavior change by addressing key barriers to vaccine communication and informed decision-making around our patient partners' and HCPs' perspectives and lived experiences to bridge theoretical frameworks with real-world relevance. Next steps include a feasibility study for further refinement and a subsequent effectiveness study.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingVaccinationVaccinesAdultCanadaFemaleHumansPregnancyVaccinesbehavioral sciencesdecision-makingdigital healthmaternal vaccinationpatient-centered carepregnancyprenatal carevaccinationvaccination hesitancyvaccine communication

Identifiers

PMID41232072
PMCPMC12754583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.