ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Acute Care Utilization Patterns During Chemotherapy and Predictive Model Development at a Rural Community Cancer Center.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute care use (ACU) is more costly and prolonged for oncology patients and often leads to treatment disruptions and worsened outcomes. Reducing ACU requires understanding risk factors and proactively identifying at-risk patients. This study addresses research gaps by developing predictive models to assess all-cause acute care use (A-ACU) versus preventable acute care use (P-ACU) and rural-specific barriers. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult oncology patients who received intravenous cancer treatment between October 2021 and April 2024 within a rural midwestern regional cancer network. We used predictor and outcome data from electronic medical records and insurance claims. We defined P-ACU using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' OP-35 criteria and classified A-ACU as any emergency department visit or hospitalization, regardless of reason. We trained LASSO and Random Forest models on 80% of the cohort to predict 30-, 90-, and 180-day risk of P-ACU and A-ACU after regimen initiation.
resultsAmong 2,922 patients, 45.3% experienced A-ACU and 10.3% had P-ACU within 180 days of chemotherapy regimen initiation. Key predictors included number of previous inpatient stays and comorbidities. Insurance type and age were more influential in predicting P-ACU, whereas laboratory values (albumin, sodium, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were more important in A-ACU models. Nearly all LASSO and Random Forest models showed strong performance (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73, mean F1 score = 0.79).
conclusionOur models effectively identify patients at high risk for ACU using routinely collected data and validate known risk factors in a large rural oncology population. Future work should integrate these tools into practice and address rural-specific challenges to reduce ACU during chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.