Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A novel scrolling text reading paradigm for improving the performance of multiclass and hybrid brain computer interface systems.

Ebru Ergün, Önder Aydemir, Onur Erdem Korkmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ebru ErgünDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-7238
Önder AydemirDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Onur Erdem KorkmazDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6336-6147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) enables direct communication between the brain and external devices, such as computers or prosthetic limbs. This allows the brain to send commands while receiving sensory feedback from the device. Despite their potential, the performance limitations of existing BCI systems have motivated researchers to improve their efficiency and reliability. To address this challenge, the present study introduces a novel BCI paradigm centered on a cognitive task involving the reading of scrolling text in four different directions: right, left, up and down. The primary objective was to explore the electroencephalography (EEG) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signals within this framework and assess the potential of hybrid BCI systems based on this innovative paradigm. The experimental protocol involved eight participants performing tasks across four classes of scrolling text. To optimize system accuracy and speed, EEG and NIRS data were segmented into discrete temporal windows. Features were extracted using the Hilbert Transform, while classification was performed via the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. The proposed approach achieved a classification accuracy of 96.28% [Formula: see text] 1.30% for multi-class tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of hybrid modalities. This study not only introduces a novel paradigm for hybrid BCI systems, but also validates its performance, providing a promising direction for advancing the field.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Computer InterfacesReadingAdultAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41231905
PMCPMC12614623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.