ArticlePloS one2025
A simplified approach to failure analysis of ball bearings combining Principal Component Analysis and Fast Fourier Transform.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ball bearing monitoring employs time-frequency techniques to facilitate the early detection of faults; however, the presence of non-stationary or noisy signals can limit the effectiveness of these techniques, requiring advanced methods for reliable predictive maintenance. This study proposes a methodology for fault detection in complex systems,utilising Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify indicators with a higher probability of fault. Subsequent to this, the signal characteristics are decomposed using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). This technique is employed to identify the Hotelling component and the SPE (quadratic prediction error), with the objective of determining the state of health of the rolling bearings. This is achieved by extracting the frequencies and harmonics that characterise the fault. The Hotelling component considers elements in the main space with a higher energy representation for evaluation, while the SPE considers elements in the residual space. The results demonstrate a rapidly appreciable range of detection and dispersion of faulty signals. A comparative analysis of the KPCA-FFT and PCA-FFT results is performed. However, this study demonstrates that the combination of PCA-FFT with the Hotelling index test and SPE is more suitable for evaluating signals with defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.