ArticlePloS one2025
Early adherence to biofeedback training predicts long-term improvement in stroke patients: A machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofeedback-based treadmill training generally involves 10 or more sessions to assess its effectiveness during stroke rehabilitation. Improvements are seen in some patients during the assessment, while others do not progress. Our aim in this study is to determine (i) if signs of progress are evident from the initial training session and (ii) whether quantitative measurements between consecutive training sessions can guide interventions for non-progressing patients. The study analyzes Minimum Foot Clearance (MFC) data from 15 stroke patients during their baseline and second training sessions to predict outcomes in the post-assessment phase. Based on early biofeedback training data, we propose a novel approach using cosine similarity (CS), correlation coefficient (CC) and cross-correlation distance (XCRD) measures to predict post-assessment improvements in stroke patients. We also introduce a new real-time adherence assessment metric (RAAM) metric to quantify improvements in adherence to feedback between consecutive training sessions, enabling more targeted interventions. The proposed approach using CS, CC and XCRD adherence indicators demonstrates 100% accuracy in predicting improvement during post-assessments. The results show that patients with MFC values dissimilar to their baseline while adhering to targeted feedback are more likely to improve. The work also indicates that patients who don't show significant overall improvement may benefit from extended training periods, suggesting the potential for personalized rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.