Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing forensic clinical competence through scenario-based simulation: A comparative study of educational outcomes in Chinese medical students.

Jiaqi Li, Chunmei Hou, Dan Yang, Xue Peng, Yingli Song, Bo Cao, Haixia Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiaqi LiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Chunmei HouDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Dan YangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xue PengDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yingli SongFunctional Experimental Teaching Centre of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Bo CaoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Haixia LiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4333-1769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionForensic clinical medicine examines injuries in living individuals and plays a critical role in criminal violence cases, trauma compensation, and judicial rulings. In China, this field contributes substantially to upholding social justice. Current educational approaches struggle to bridge the gap between theory and practice, largely due to privacy constraints during forensic examinations, leaving students ill-prepared to assess real cases and identify key evaluation criteria. Scenario-based simulation training presents a promising alternative to conventional case-based teaching.

methodsWe compared the efficacy of traditional case-based teaching with scenario-based simulation in a forensic clinical medicine course. Two cohorts of undergraduate forensic science students from consecutive academic years underwent each teaching method. Post-course assessments included theoretical examinations and practical evaluations as quantitative measures of knowledge acquisition. Professional instructors graded students' performance, while self-evaluation surveys captured learning experiences.

resultsScenario-based simulation teaching yielded superior learning outcomes. The simulation group (2020 cohort) achieved higher scores than the traditional group (2019 cohort) in both theoretical (*p < 0.05) and practical assessments, with notably better knowledge retention (subjective questions: **p < 0.01; objective questions: *p < 0.05). The simulation group also demonstrated stronger theory-practice integration (r = 0.9622 vs. 0.9115). Instructor evaluations (n = 11) demonstrated that scenario-based simulation teaching improved students' learning motivation (81.8%), theoretical application (72.7%), communication skills (81.8%), analytical abilities (63.6%), and teamwork competencies (54.5%). All instructors reported enhanced professional image, with 90.9% noting increased teaching motivation. Student self-assessments reinforced these results: over 80% of the simulation group reported gains in theoretical learning effectiveness, analytical/operational capabilities, and professional self-assurance, versus ≤31.9% in the traditional group. Classroom metrics favored the simulation group (self-study interest: 65% vs. 45.5%; engagement: 90% vs. 45.5%; collaboration: 80% vs. 36.4%), though 10% cited challenges with preparatory workload.

conclusionScenario-based simulation teaching significantly enhances forensic clinical education by strengthening the connection between theory and practice while improving student competencies. Addressing teaching costs and adapting to student needs will further refine its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateForensic MedicineSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41231894
PMCPMC12614606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.