ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Barriers to contraceptive implant removal among current and prior implant users in Kisumu, Kenya: Results from a cross-sectional population-based survey.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When choice is not performative: the struggle for agency among women accessing family planning services in Senegal.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been increased promotion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the Global South in recent years. Studies have documented that women face barriers to removal when they desire to discontinue their LARC method, though few have quantified how often such experiences occur. We estimated the proportion of current and prior implant users who experienced or anticipated challenges with method removal using secondary data from a population-based survey administered to reproductive-aged women (18-49 years) in Kisumu, Kenya. We included women who reported current contraceptive implant use (n = 518) or ever using an implant that was later removed (n = 838). We asked current implant users about their anticipated barriers to removal and experiences seeking removal. We asked those who reported prior implant removal about barriers they faced when seeking removal. Around 40% of current implant users anticipated barriers to implant removal. About 2% of current implant users had sought removal unsuccessfully in the last year, with cost being the most common barrier. Of those who had ever had an implant removed, 15% reported facing challenges with removal, with cost again being the most common barrier. Sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with facing challenges with removal. Many women anticipated or experienced barriers to implant removal. Cost was the most common barrier reported, highlighting the importance of eliminating fees associated with removal to ensure all women can discontinue their method when desired.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.