Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231889›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Barriers to contraceptive implant removal among current and prior implant users in Kisumu, Kenya: Results from a cross-sectional population-based survey.

Brooke W Bullington, Stephanie Chung, Emilia Goland, Dickens Otieno Onyango, Leigh Senderowicz, Abigael Mwanyiro, Claire W Rothschild, Ben Wekesa, Brian Frizzelle, Ginger Golub and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brooke W BullingtonDivision of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3341-087X
Stephanie ChungDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Emilia GolandDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7407-4298
Dickens Otieno OnyangoKisumu County Department of Health, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-0531
Leigh SenderowiczDepartment of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-1473
Abigael MwanyiroInnovations for Poverty Action (IPA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Claire W RothschildPopulation Services International, Washington D.C., United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-9881
Ben WekesaInnovations for Poverty Action (IPA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Brian FrizzelleCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7705-0204
Ginger GolubInnovations for Poverty Action (IPA), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-4758
Katherine TumlinsonCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

Research Training Program in Reproductive and Sexual HealthR25HD115514 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JESSICA N SANDERS, David Turok · 2024 to 2026
$474k
NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD115514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been increased promotion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the Global South in recent years. Studies have documented that women face barriers to removal when they desire to discontinue their LARC method, though few have quantified how often such experiences occur. We estimated the proportion of current and prior implant users who experienced or anticipated challenges with method removal using secondary data from a population-based survey administered to reproductive-aged women (18-49 years) in Kisumu, Kenya. We included women who reported current contraceptive implant use (n = 518) or ever using an implant that was later removed (n = 838). We asked current implant users about their anticipated barriers to removal and experiences seeking removal. We asked those who reported prior implant removal about barriers they faced when seeking removal. Around 40% of current implant users anticipated barriers to implant removal. About 2% of current implant users had sought removal unsuccessfully in the last year, with cost being the most common barrier. Of those who had ever had an implant removed, 15% reported facing challenges with removal, with cost again being the most common barrier. Sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with facing challenges with removal. Many women anticipated or experienced barriers to implant removal. Cost was the most common barrier reported, highlighting the importance of eliminating fees associated with removal to ensure all women can discontinue their method when desired.

Identifiers

PMID41231889
PMCPMC12614572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.