ArticlePloS one2025
Choosing between city and suburb: How urbanization shapes graduates' housing preferences.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the housing selection mechanism of college graduates between urban and suburban areas under the background of accelerated global urbanization and regional differentiation, focusing on how they balance multiple factors such as employment opportunities, transportation convenience, living costs, career development, residential satisfaction, and family support under conditions of incomplete information and resource constraints. Research the integration of bounded rationality theory and consumer satisfaction theory to construct an analytical framework, collect data through questionnaire surveys, and use structural equation modeling for empirical testing. Research has found that external environmental factors (employment opportunities, transportation convenience, living costs, and work environment) significantly affect housing choices through direct and indirect pathways, with living costs and career planning showing a positive driving effect, while residential satisfaction plays a key mediating role. It is particularly noteworthy that family economic support not only directly affects housing decisions, but also significantly regulates the strength of the impact of living costs and employment opportunities. The research results not only expand the application of behavioral decision-making theory in the housing field but also provide important basis for government departments to optimize regional resource allocation, improve transportation networks, and formulate targeted housing policies. At the same time, it also provides practical reference for real estate developers' market positioning and university employment guidance services. The comprehensive analysis framework established in this study also lays the methodological foundation for future largssse-scale studies that include more dynamic variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.