ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Development and validation of a multi-modal contactless sensing system for surgical risk analysis in a real-world environment.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait measurements are a central component of functional assessments and risk stratification before surgery. Various sensors can measure gait metrics, but none are routinely integrated into surgical workflows because they are too challenging to implement at scale in clinical situations. In this manuscript, we report the development and validation of a rapidly-deployable, low footprint, entirely contactless sensing system, called GroundCode, that is explicitly integrated within a surgical workflow. GroundCode combines the Microsoft Kinect with seven floor-mounted single-axis accelerometers, overcoming the weaknesses of each individual sensor technology and providing both robust spatiotemporal resolution (Kinect) and high-fidelity footstep detection and quantification (floor accelerometers). We show that GroundCode-derived gait speed and cadence are highly precise measurements (>90%), and we validate them against two standard clinical gait measurements relevant to pre-surgical evaluations - stopwatch time and six-minute walk test distance. We show that GroundCode-derived gait metrics identify various surgical risk factors, like age, sex, and frailty. In addition, we show that preoperative gait is associated with postoperative quality of recovery. Importantly, we designed this system to be deployed by non-technical personnel and performed this study in a non-laboratory setting, providing proof-of-principle that GroundCode can be used in various real-world environments. We conclude that GroundCode provides highly robust gait measurements in real-world settings with possible applications spanning clinical diagnosis, risk stratification, and digital biomarker development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.