Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Automated framework for multi-domain social media text analysis for business strategy employing multilayer perceptron with Word2Vec features and LIME XAI.

Amira Turki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amira TurkiCollege of Business Administration, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6225-2751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is a pivotal domain in Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly for understanding opinions expressed in sequential and textual data with the usage of machine learning. It involves identifying and categorizing emotions expressed in textual reviews and messages. Social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram generate extensive datasets rich in sentiments, making their analysis crucial for monitoring public opinion and informing business strategy. By uncovering customer satisfaction levels, product feedback, and service-related concerns, sentiment analysis helps organizations refine marketing efforts, optimize product features, and improve service delivery. Traditional machine learning techniques struggle to process large datasets and yield accurate results efficiently. To address this, we propose an effective multi-layer perceptron deep network with word embedding features, called MultiSentiNet, for sentiment analysis on Twitter datasets. The proposed model's performance is evaluated against conventional machine learning classifiers and state-of-the-art deep learning classifiers, indicating superior accuracy with three different datasets. The significance of the proposed model is further tested on three diverse datasets (women's e-commerce, US airline sentiments, and hate text-speech detection) that demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms other classifiers in terms of accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. The performance of the proposed model is compared with previously published research works. Furthermore, the interpretability and analysis of MultiSentiNet results are explained using the LIME XAI technique, providing deeper insights into the model's predictions and practical value in strategic business decision-making.

Indexed as

CommerceNatural Language ProcessingSocial MediaHumansMachine LearningMultilayer PerceptronsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID41231814
PMCPMC12614609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.