ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2025
Applications of Large Language Models and Prompt Optimization for Knowledge Extraction from Biological Pathway Figures.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities for image comprehension. This study aims to automate and enhance the extraction of gene interactions from biological pathway images by integrating LLMs and a Genetic Algorithm (GA). A dataset of 200 tumor signaling pathway figures from the recent biological literature was employed to assess the performance of four AI chatbots: GPT-4oV, Claude-3.5V, Gemini-1.5V, and Llama-3.2V, with GA used to optimize prompts for each model. Model performance was evaluated on both directional and non-directional gene relationship extraction. GA-optimized prompts significantly improved extraction accuracies across all LLMs, with GPT 4oV achieving an F1-score of 0.645 (±0.055) and Llama-3.2V achieving an F1-score of 0.616 (±0.068). For non-directional interactions, GPT-4oV outperformed other models, reaching a precision of 0.805, a recall of 0.695, and an F1 score of 0.757, followed by Llama-3.2V and Claude-3.5V with F1-scores of 0.702 and 0.697, respectively, while Gemini-1.5V lagged with 0.612. In directional interaction predictions, all models performed lower, with GPT-4oV leading at 0.687 F1-score, followed by Llama-3.2V at 0.656, Claude-3.5V at 0.641, and Gemini-1.5V at 0.573. While these results demonstrate substantial improvements over traditional OCR-based approaches, further advances in model accuracy and explainability are needed for widespread adoption in critical biomedical applications. Nevertheless, these findings provide a valuable benchmark for the research community and a foundation for future development of specialized, fine-tuned models and scalable multimodal AI frameworks in biomedical data analysis. The source code is publicly available on https://github.com/Muh-aza/LLM_GPV.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.