Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231551›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Few-shot CBCT-based synthetic CT generation with denoising diffusion probabilistic model.

Ping Lin Yeap, Xin Du, Meng Zhou, Andrew Hoole, Gillian C Barnett, Rajesh Jena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ping Lin YeapDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Xin DuDepartment of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Meng ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Andrew HooleDepartment of Medical Physics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Gillian C BarnettDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Rajesh JenaDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn adaptive cancer radiotherapy, treatment plans were periodically re-optimised according to anatomical variations, with the goal of maintaining or improving clinical outcomes. This required high-quality in-room imaging for daily monitoring, tumour/organ segmentation and dose evaluation. However, in-room cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images suffered from inaccurate Hounsfield Unit (HU) values and poor image quality due to higher artifact presence and lower signal-to-noise ratio. While CBCT-to-CT generation models have shown promising results, many conventional networks require large datasets for training. PURPOSE: To address this, we proposed a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) with a modified sampling process to enable few-shot synthetic CT (sCT) generation from CBCT images.

methodsWe used a denoising diffusion probabilistic model trained on rigidly registered CT-CBCT image pairs in our approach, without requiring deformable registrations. Our model was trained on 25 patients from a head-and-neck cancer cohort at our institution, and validated and tested on separate sets of seven and eight patients. Our sampling method leveraged channel- and noised-conditioning, demonstrating high-quality sCT generation with limited training data. By adding noise to guiding CBCT images during sampling, we exploited the convergence of CBCT and planning CT (pCT) representations in latent space. This allowed sampling from a noisy representation of the data, achieving sCTs with high fidelity.

resultsEvaluation on a head-and-neck (H&N) cancer dataset showed that sCTs outperformed CBCTs, reducing masked mean absolute error (MAE) from 131 ± 17 HU to 49 ± 7 HU, and improving peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) from 20.0 ± 0.9 dB to 22.9 ± 1.1 dB and normalised cross-correlation (NCC) from 0.93 ± 0.01 to 0.96 ± 0.01. We further evaluated the method's generalisability on phantoms and publicly available patient datasets. Without retraining, the model achieved moderate improvements over CBCT (e.g., masked MAE 87 ± 17 HU, PSNR 19.4 ± 1.7 dB, NCC 0.93 ± 0.04) on the external H&N dataset. However, after retraining on 27 in-distribution patient cases, the model achieved comparable performance to our internal dataset, with MAE 48 ± 12 HU, PSNR 22.2 ± 2.5 dB, and NCC 0.95 ± 0.03. We also extended the model to the pelvis site, achieving similarly strong results (masked MAE 44 ± 9 HU, PSNR 21.9 ± 2.1 dB, NCC 0.96 ± 0.03), demonstrating the feasibility of our method across multiple anatomical sites. Visual inspections showed improved image quality, significantly reduced artifacts, and better anatomical preservation in sCTs. Clinician evaluations revealed a higher preference to use sCTs over pCTs for fractional evaluation.

conclusionsOur work offered a practical, data-efficient and site-robust solution for clinics to generate high-fidelity sCTs, facilitating CBCT-based dose evaluation and plan adaptation in adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, StatisticalSignal-To-Noise RatioDiffusionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansadaptive radiotherapycone‐beam CTdiffusion modelsynthetic CT generation

Identifiers

PMID41231551
PMCPMC12614291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.