Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231537›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2025

Microbial Primer: Artificial intelligence for microbiologists.

Hanqun Cao, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanqun CaoMachine Biology Group, Departments of Psychiatry and Microbiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cesar de la Fuente-NunezMachine Biology Group, Departments of Psychiatry and Microbiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are reshaping microbiology, enabling rapid antibiotic discovery, resistance prediction and clinical diagnostics. For microbiologists, the goal is not to build new algorithms but to recognize when ML is appropriate, how to prepare data and how to interpret outputs responsibly. This primer takes that practical stance - driving the ML car rather than rebuilding the engine. At a high level, ML learns from complex patterns, often noisy data. In antibiotic discovery, ML models help identify compounds in biological data and design new ones from scratch using generative AI. In microbiome studies, where measurements are compositional, sparse and often confounded, ML helps uncover community structure and link taxa or functions to phenotypes. In pathogen genomics, supervised models map sequence-derived features (e.g. k‑mers, SNPs and gene presence/absence) to outcomes such as species identity, antimicrobial susceptibility or MIC. Unsupervised learning supports exploration, including clustering, latent gradients and dimensionality reduction for visualization. Across these settings, success hinges less on exotic architectures than on sound problem framing, careful preprocessing and experimental validation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMicrobiologyAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMicrobiotaAnti-Bacterial Agentsartificial intelligencemachine learningmicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID41231537
PMCPMC12614359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.