ReviewJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026
Deep Learning in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.
Review in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the Black Box in Deep Learning Models-Reply.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Redefining Nursing in Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Care: Implications of the ICN's 2025 Definitions for an Evolving Specialty.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2026Article
- Exploring perceptions of data risks in AI-enabled nursing research: A qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence, uses multilayered neural networks to uncover complex patterns in large datasets without manual feature engineering. Unlike traditional machine learning, DL autonomously learns hierarchical representations from raw data, offering distinct advantages for analyzing images (eg, stroboscopy) and physiologic signals (eg, cochlear implant optimization). Despite these advances, DL remains conceptually difficult for many clinicians to integrate into routine clinical practice. This narrative review sought to synthesize recent DL applications and propose a framework for their integration in otolaryngology. Observations: A total of 1422 articles (2020-2025) were screened, and 327 original research studies on DL in otolaryngology were included in the analysis. The included articles were categorized into 4 domains: detection and diagnosis (179 [55%]), prediction and prognostics (16; [5%]), image segmentation (93 [28%]), and emerging applications (39 [12%]). Proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated that DL systems can achieve acceptable diagnostic performance comparable to experts, with models accurately identifying nasopharyngeal carcinoma (92%), laryngeal malignant neoplasms (86%), and otologic pathology (>95%). Prognostic applications included survival stratification in oropharyngeal cancer and recurrence prediction in chronic rhinosinusitis. Segmentation models reliably delineated anatomical regions. Emerging uses encompassed hearing aid optimization, surgical instrument tracking, and intraoperative landmark identification. Further progress requires multi-institutional datasets, standardized acquisition protocols, and transparent, interpretable models to improve trust and clinical adoption. Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review found that DL applications in otolaryngology show potential for improving diagnostic performance, predicting outcomes, and providing intraoperative guidance. Widespread and equitable adoption needs to be supported by harmonized, high-quality, and representative datasets, as well as the mitigation of algorithmic bias and robust model interpretability. Federated learning and explainability are emerging frameworks that support the preservation of privacy and increased clinician trust. Standardized reporting, prospective validation, human-in-the-loop models, and interdisciplinary partnerships can help balance the promise of algorithmic approaches and their clinical utility, ensuring that DL tools contribute meaningfully to patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.