Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231404›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025

Understanding normocephalic craniosynostosis: a case-control study on prevalence, clinical features, and neurodevelopmental challenges.

Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk, Sirin Nittayakasetwat, Sirin Apichonbancha, Nachasa Khongchu, Mark H Moore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Postoperative raised ICP after minimally invasive surgery for monosutural craniosynostosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarut ChaisrisawadisukDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. sarut.cha@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-0784
Sirin NittayakasetwatDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirin ApichonbanchaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nachasa KhongchuResearch Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mark H MooreCleft and Craniofacial South Australia, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2136-0315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates normocephalic craniosynostosis (NC), a condition characterised by the premature fusion of cranial sutures without visible cranial deformities, which may be associated with significant neurodevelopmental risks.

methodsA case-control study was conducted involving patients aged 1 to 20 years with incidental diagnoses via CT scans. We collected comprehensive data from electronic medical records, including demographics, CT characteristics, neurological symptoms, and comorbidities.

resultsThe study included 42 NC cases and 41 controls with patent cranial sutures. The average cephalic index was 81.7% in NC cases and 81.2% in controls, with no significant difference (p = 0.44). The mean age at scanning was similar between groups (11.7 years for NC versus 11.3 years for controls, p = 0.29). Notably, a marked male predominance was observed among NC cases (83.3% versus 56.1% in controls, p = 0.01). Additionally, a history of abnormal neurological issues was more common in the NC group (35.7%) compared to 19.5% in controls. A family history of abnormal neurodevelopment was noted in 4.8% of NC cases and was absent in controls; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08).

conclusionsThese findings underscore the possible pathological implications of NC, emphasising the need for enhanced clinical vigilance and thorough monitoring. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial in evaluating and managing these patients to ensure optimal care and enhance understanding of NC, despite the absence of external cranial deformities.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesNeurodevelopmental DisordersAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePrevalenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCraniofacial abnormalitiesCraniosynostosisIntracranial pressureNeurodevelopmental disordersNormocephalic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.