Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231385›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

A mixed methods approach (EXPANS) to assess current and future uses of antimicrobials: a case study of ceftaroline.

Hester H Stoorvogel, Marlies E J L Hulscher, Eva Kolwijck, Robert A G Huis In 't Veld, Adar Zeren, Jeroen A Schouten, Jaap Ten Oever, Heiman F L Wertheim

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hester H StoorvogelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Hester.Stoorvogel@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-6764
Marlies E J L HulscherIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eva KolwijckDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Robert A G Huis In 't VeldDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Adar ZerenRadboudumc Community for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, route 462, Nijmegen, 6500 HB , the Netherlands.
Jeroen A SchoutenIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jaap Ten OeverDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Heiman F L WertheimRadboudumc Community for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, route 462, Nijmegen, 6500 HB , the Netherlands.

Funding

Pfizer Netherlands 62050035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to rising antibiotic resistance rates, treating infections becomes more complex. To tackle this, old and new antibiotics will need to be used more frequently for additional indications outside the scope of their original registrations. We aimed to introduce a mixed methods approach to identify off-label indications for antimicrobials in specific settings, and applied this to an antimicrobial not commonly used in the Netherlands, ceftaroline.

methodsWe developed the Exploratory Positioning of Antimicrobials in New Settings (EXPANS) approach, which includes a systematic literature review, an observational study and an expert meeting. We applied our approach to ceftaroline to explore off-label indications and its potential use in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

resultsIn both the literature and Dutch hospitals, ceftaroline was mainly prescribed as second-line treatment following treatment failure or side effects, often for endocarditis and bone and joint infections. Combination therapy with daptomycin was common, and ceftaroline was used in OPAT. In Dutch hospitals, only 48 patients were prescribed ceftaroline in the last five years. Experts experienced a lack of evidence, reimbursement issues, and the risk of leukopenia as key barriers to its use. Dutch experts noted potential for off-label use of ceftaroline in endocarditis and as prophylaxis for prosthetic joint revision surgery.

conclusionThe components used in our EXPANS approach were complementary, gathering original data on clinical experiences with specific antimicrobials and identifying barriers to their use in practice. We recommend this systematic approach to explore untapped potential of existing antimicrobial agents and optimize their use.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsOff-Label UseCeftarolineHumansNetherlandsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporinsAntimicrobialsCeftarolineDrug repurposingMixed methods approachOff-label indicationsOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.