ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Resolution and quality enhancement of SPECT cerebral blood flow images using Pix2pix deep learning.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Modality Deep Learning Denoising for Low-Dose μSPECT: Transfer of PET-Trained U‑Net and Diffusion Models.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging can be performed using SPECT with
methodsSeventy-three patients with suspected cerebral ischemia underwent CBF imaging using SPECT (Symbia, with
resultsThe P2P-SPECT-CBF images demonstrated improved visual similarity to PET images, with an average score of 4.2 and 3.5 in open and blind assessments, respectively. The SSIM value of conventional SPECT images compared to PET was 0.79, while that of P2P images was 0.86 and those were significantly different, indicating enhanced structural similarity. In ROI analysis, the correlation between SPECT and PET CBF values was y = 0.13 + 0.63x, r = 0.77 (p < 0.01). The correlation between P2P-SPECT and PET was y = 0.10 + 0.65x, r = 0.78 (p < 0.01), and between P2P-SPECT and SPECT, the relationship was y = 0.01 + 0.89x, r = 0.86 (p < 0.01).
conclusionThe proposed method generated P2P-SPECT-CBF images with image contrast closely resembling that of PET-CBF, while preserving the quantitative properties of SPECT-CBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41231365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.