ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Patient-reported oral adverse events during cancer chemotherapy: longitudinal evaluation using patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) and concordance with clinician assessments.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring toxicity better: patient-reported outcome-informed calibration for CTCAE assessment.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to (1) describe longitudinal trends in patient-reported oral adverse events using the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in patients receiving multidisciplinary oral care during outpatient cancer drug therapy, and (2) evaluate concordance between PRO-CTCAE and clinician-reported CTCAE scores.
methodsConducted at the Outpatient Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital (June-December 2023), oral adverse events were assessed using PRO-CTCAE and CTCAE at baseline and every 3 weeks up to 24 weeks. Concordance for dry mouth and oral mucositis was evaluated using paired same-day scores.
resultsAmong patients receiving multidisciplinary oral care, 85.2% experienced at least one oral adverse event, most commonly dry mouth. Based on PRO-CTCAE, symptoms rated as moderate or higher were reported in fewer than 10% of cases for most items. Notably, over half of patients reported persistent dry mouth of at least mild severity, and 20-30% of other symptoms also remained. These findings suggest that even lower-grade symptoms may persist and affect quality of life. Concordance between PRO-CTCAE and CTCAE was limited, with 31.1% of patients reporting greater dry mouth severity than clinicians documented.
conclusionsPatient-reported oral adverse events, as assessed by PRO-CTCAE, were frequently mild but persistent throughout outpatient chemotherapy, suggesting a cumulative impact on quality of life. Concordance between PRO-CTCAE and clinician-reported CTCAE was limited, indicating that clinician assessments may underestimate symptoms such as dry mouth. These findings underscore the need to integrate patient-reported outcomes into routine oral care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.