Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231351›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Canonical and hierarchical analyses of body measurements in four Nigerian cattle breeds under an extensive management system.

J J Okoh, W P B Putra, Y Ibrahim, A Maigado, S Ibrahim, B S Ma'aruf, A Shuaibu, J P Adakole, R S Harahap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J J OkohDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria. okohjoe4u@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-7492
W P B PutraResearch Center for Applied Zoology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, West Java, 16911, Indonesia.
Y IbrahimDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria.
A MaigadoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria.
S IbrahimDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria.
B S Ma'arufDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria.
A ShuaibuDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, 771103, Nigeria.
J P AdakoleDepartment of Agricultural Science Education, Federal College of Education, Odugbo, Benue State, 972107, Nigeria.
R S HarahapDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Jambi, Jambi, 36122, Indonesia.

Funding

Tertiary Education Trust Fund TETF/DR&D/CE/UNI/KASHERE/IBR/2019/VOL.1).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle are significant livestock worldwide, primarily kept for meat and milk production. Four Nigerian cattle breeds of White Fulani (Bos indicus), Gudali (Bos indicus), Azawak (Bos indicus), and Red Bororo (Bos taurus × Bos indicus) had the genetic potential to produce meat and milk optimally under extensive management systems. This study aimed to characterize these four adult Nigerian cattle breeds based on 26 body measurement variables. Two statistical analyses, canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), were performed to differentiate the breeds using SPSS 16.0 software. The results revealed that 13 variables of head width, head length, body length, body width, body depth, chest length, chest girth, chest depth, rump length, rump width, hump length, hump width, and dewlap width were discriminant variables for characterizing the four Nigerian cattle breeds. Furthermore, the breeds Gudali (GU), Azawak (AZ), and White Fulani (WF) / Red Bororo (RB) could be classified into distinct clusters based on these morphometric traits. The canonical correlation coefficients were 0.95 for function 1 and 0.86 for function 2. However, the WF and RB breeds could not be discriminated based on their body measurements due to their close genetic distance (0.21). In contrast, the genetic distance between GU and AZ breeds was 1.77. Overall, the body measurements were able to classify approximately 87% of WF, 99% of GU, 98% of AZ, and 70% of RB into their original groups. In conclusion, the body measurements of WF and RB are similar, which may be attributed to their close genetic composition, likely resulting from continuous crossbreeding over several generations.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsBreedingCattleCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleMaleNigeriaBody measurementCDACharacterizationHCANigerian cattle

Identifiers

PMID41231351
PMCPMC12615529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.