Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231332›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026

Automated AI fracture detection in initial presentation pediatric wrist X-rays: effects and benefits of adding follow-up examinations.

Mario Scherkl, Nikolaus Stranger, Andreea Ciornei-Hoffman, Georg Singer, Tristan Till, Holger Till, Franko Hržić, Sebastian Tschauner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mario ScherklDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.
Nikolaus StrangerDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria. nikolaus.stranger@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7274-9403
Andreea Ciornei-HoffmanDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.
Georg SingerDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.
Tristan TillDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.
Holger TillDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.
Franko HržićUniversity of Rijeka, Center for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, Radmile Matejcic 2, Rijeka, 51000, Primorsko-Goranska, Croatia.
Sebastian TschaunerDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, Graz, 8036, Styria, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) in radiology has shown promise in detecting fractures on initial X-rays. However, the role of follow-up examinations in enhancing AI performance remains unexplored. This study evaluates the impact of including follow-up X-rays on the performance of neural networks in detecting pediatric wrist fractures.

methodsUsing the publicly available GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset of 20,327 pediatric wrist X-rays, we created four training datasets: initial X-rays alone and combinations with follow-up X-rays (with and without casts). Two neural networks, EfficientNet (image classification) and YOLOv8 (object detection), were trained and evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and AP metrics. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets, with 500 initial X-rays separated and reserved for testing.

resultsEfficientNet models showed no statistically significant improvements in classification performance with the inclusion of follow-up X-rays. In contrast, YOLOv8 demonstrated improved object detection metrics, particularly AP50 (p = 0.003) and F1 score (p = 0.009), when follow-up X-rays were included. The improvement was most evident when both cast and non-cast follow-ups were incorporated.

conclusionAdding follow-up X-rays did not enhance classification performance but improved fracture localization in object detection tasks. These findings suggest that including follow-up data shows no relevant improvement in the detection rate of fractures but can enhance AI applications for pediatric wrist fracture detection, particularly for object detection models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFractures, BoneRadiographyWrist InjuriesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerAftercareArtificial intelligenceDigital radiographyFracturePediatric radiologyTraumaWrist

Identifiers

PMID41231332
PMCPMC12982319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.