ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026
Automated AI fracture detection in initial presentation pediatric wrist X-rays: effects and benefits of adding follow-up examinations.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Supported Prediction of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children Based on Cystoscopic Configuration of the Ureteric Orifice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) in radiology has shown promise in detecting fractures on initial X-rays. However, the role of follow-up examinations in enhancing AI performance remains unexplored. This study evaluates the impact of including follow-up X-rays on the performance of neural networks in detecting pediatric wrist fractures.
methodsUsing the publicly available GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset of 20,327 pediatric wrist X-rays, we created four training datasets: initial X-rays alone and combinations with follow-up X-rays (with and without casts). Two neural networks, EfficientNet (image classification) and YOLOv8 (object detection), were trained and evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and AP metrics. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets, with 500 initial X-rays separated and reserved for testing.
resultsEfficientNet models showed no statistically significant improvements in classification performance with the inclusion of follow-up X-rays. In contrast, YOLOv8 demonstrated improved object detection metrics, particularly AP50 (p = 0.003) and F1 score (p = 0.009), when follow-up X-rays were included. The improvement was most evident when both cast and non-cast follow-ups were incorporated.
conclusionAdding follow-up X-rays did not enhance classification performance but improved fracture localization in object detection tasks. These findings suggest that including follow-up data shows no relevant improvement in the detection rate of fractures but can enhance AI applications for pediatric wrist fracture detection, particularly for object detection models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.