ArticleCurrent medical science2025
Few-Shot Learning for CT Lung Nodule Detection Based on Open-Set Object Detection.
Article in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a few-shot learning model for lung nodule detection in CT images by leveraging visual open-set object detection.
methodsThe Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 (LUNA16) public dataset was used for validation. It was split into training and testing sets in an 8:2 ratio. Classical You Only Look Once (YOLO) models of three sizes (n, m, x) were trained on the training set. Transfer learning experiments were then conducted using the mainstream open-set object detection models derived from Detection Transformer (DETR) with Improved DeNoising AnchOr Boxes (DINO), i.e., Grounding DINO and Open-Vocabulary DINO (OV-DINO), as well as our proposed few-shot learning model, across a range of different shot sizes. Finally, all trained models were compared on the test set.
resultsAfter training on LUNA16, the precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) of the different-sized YOLO models showed no significant differences, with peak values of 82.8%, 73.1%, and 77.4%, respectively. OV-DINO's recall was significantly higher than YOLO's, but it did not show clear advantages in precision or mAP. Using only one-fifth of the training samples and one-tenth of the training epochs, our proposed model outperformed both YOLO and OV-DINO, achieving improvements of 6.6%, 9.3%, and 6.9% in precision, recall, and mAP, respectively, with final values of 89.4%, 96.2%, and 87.7%.
conclusionThe proposed few-shot learning model demonstrates stronger scene transfer capabilities, requiring fewer samples and training epochs, and can effectively improve the accuracy of lung nodule detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41231315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.