ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2025
Tooth show enhancement in the esthetic zone: a review and proposal a decision-making framework.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article aims to comprehensively review the clinical indications for esthetic crown lengthening (CL) and to propose a decision-making framework that incorporates key yet often overlooked factors influencing treatment planning. To gain a deeper understanding of the various clinical scenarios in which esthetic CL may be indicated, individual conditions are examined in detail, each accompanied by an appropriate treatment approach. Based on this analysis, we introduce a decision-making framework designed to guide clinicians in selecting the optimal treatment modality by accurately identifying the underlying esthetic concerns. The majority of published clinical guidelines for esthetic CL focus predominantly on cases with excessive gingival display. However, patients presenting without gingival display who may still benefit from esthetic CL are frequently neglected in the literature. Additionally, the influence of the smile arc and its relationship to incisal edge positioning remains underrepresented in current discussions. Our proposed decision-making framework integrates these critical factors to support more individualized and comprehensive treatment planning. Clinicians must possess a thorough understanding of all relevant esthetic and functional parameters when evaluating candidates for esthetic CL. Moreover, early and coordinated consultation with the prosthodontist is essential to define the appropriate balance between surgical and restorative interventions prior to surgical execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.