ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2025
Psychological Impact of Screening for Risk of Type 1 Diabetes: an Update.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychosocial implications, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed methods evidence synthesis.Diabetologia · 2026Pooled it
- A UK Healthcare Professional Perspective on the Implementation of Monitoring in Children and Young People With Early-Stage Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Psychosocial aspects of early detection in type 1 diabetes: Language matters, decision making and support needs.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- Identification and Follow-up of At-Risk Children Mitigate Disease Severity and Improve Treatment Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Advancing Early-Stage Type 1 Diabetes Care: Future Focused Pathways for Identification, Screening, Diagnosis, and Monitoring.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSummarize recent literature on: understanding of and emotional reactions to type 1 diabetes (T1D) risk; willingness to be screened; behavioral responses to T1D-risk screening results; and provider attitudes/concerns about general population screening. RECENT
findingsDifficulty understanding what it means to be at increased risk for T1D is common; anxiety about increased risk may occur, particularly in multiple islet autoantibody positive (IA+) individuals. Many are hesitant to be screened or to be medically monitored if at increased risk. Those at risk may engage in behaviors to try to prevent T1D. Providers are often cautious about general population screening, with concerns about associated anxiety paramount. Understanding the psychosocial implications of T1D-risk screening is critical to its success. Interventions are needed to improve understanding of the purpose, procedures and consequences of screening, what it means to be at risk, and ways to cope with associated anxiety. The psychosocial impact of a Stage 1 or Stage 2 T1D diagnosis needs clarification and the availability of drugs to delay disease onset is likely to have a significant impact on the decision to be screened and monitored if at-risk for T1D. The impact of screening on children as well as their role in screening/medical monitoring decision-making needs to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41231287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.