ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
Intestinal microbiome diversity and disparity between wild and captive endangered Asian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus) in southern India.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiome affects the physical and mental wellbeing of an animal. Several factors, including diet, host physiology, age, sex, lifestyle, and environmental factors, influence the dynamic gut microbiome. We studied the gut microbiome composition of the endangered Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) kept under prolonged captive conditions (15.8 ± 3.9 years) and their wild counterparts, as both were exposed to two different environmental pressures. A total of 648,581 high-quality sequences were obtained, comprising 208 microbial families from 22 phyla and 97 orders, as determined by high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Among them, 90% of the microbes belonged to the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Our analysis revealed a distinct variation in the gut microbiome between captive and wild elephants. The captive elephants had a higher abundance of the microbial phyla Kiritimatiellaeota, Tenericutes, Euryarchaeota, and Verrucomicrobia, which suggests that captivity alters the gut microbiome. These findings reveal distinct patterns of gut microbiome diversity between captive and wild elephants, underscoring the role of diet and environmental conditions in shaping the elephant gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41231285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.