ArticleScience and engineering ethics2025
A Case Study in Arts-Informed Ethics Education in the Nuclear and Radiological Sciences.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for cross-disciplinary researchers and professionals in the radiological sciences who can navigate complex interconnected ethical-social-technical issues, communicate across a wide audience in consideration of multiple stakeholder perspectives, and remain self-critical, aware, and reflective of the field with the intent of continuous improvement within the broader profession. Given that traditional curriculum related to the nuclear and radiological sciences emphasizes the technological, scientific aspects of radioactivity and ionizing radiation, a graduate-level course in "nuclear culture" was developed that employs various forms of art, expression, and material culture as a vehicle for encouraging deeper, dedicated reflection on related social and ethical issues. This paper provides a description of course structure and representative content, along with discussion of student perceptions, as a case study in the use of an arts-informed approach (that is, a STEAM-based approach) to guiding students through perspective-taking, self-expression, and authentic and critical evaluation of broad issues surrounding current and historical use of radiation. The course consists of discussions, reflective writing, and projects, supplemented with hands-on activities. Student perceptions of the course, elucidated through thematic analysis of post-hoc surveys, revolved around: novel educational approaches; student engagement and validation; ethics, morals, and empathy; and the societal impact of nuclear. Review of student and instructor perceptions suggests that art in various forms can be incorporated into graduate-level curriculum to improve the educational experience of nuclear-focused students and promote deeper reflection and understanding of social and ethical issues related to their chosen field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.