ArticleCancer research2026
CanSig Benchmarks Methods for Reproducible Cancer Cell State Discovery from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data.
Article in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing facilitates the discovery of gene expression signatures that define cell states across patients, which could be used in patient stratification and precision oncology. However, the lack of standardization in computational methodologies used to analyze these data impedes the reproducibility of signature detection. To address this, we developed CanSig, a comprehensive benchmarking tool that evaluates methods for identifying transcriptional signatures in cancer. CanSig integrates metrics for batch correction and biological signal conservation with a transcriptional signature correlation metric to score methods according to signature rediscovery, cross-dataset reproducibility, and clinical relevance. CanSig was applied to 13 methods on 12 single-cell RNA sequencing datasets from five human cancer types-glioblastoma, breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma-representing 185 patients and 174,000 malignant cells. The signatures identified with these methods correlated with clinically relevant outcomes, including patient survival and lymph node metastasis. These results identified Harmony, BBKNN, and fastMNN as the highest-scoring integration methods for discovering shared transcriptional states in cancer. Overall, CanSig provides a standardized, reproducible framework for uncovering clinically relevant cancer cell states in single-cell transcriptomics. SIGNIFICANCE: The development of CanSig facilitates computational strategies for the reproducible discovery of shared cancer cell states, improving cross-study reliability and enabling the detection of clinically relevant gene signatures. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.