ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Representation of Older Adult Patients in Clinical Trials.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity in Translation: Equal Is Greater Than.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Biologics in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Invisible Barrier of Neighborhood Disadvantage in Clinical Trial Recruitment and Retention Among Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Geriatric medicine and its multiple roles in shaping the future of health care.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab versus Benralizumab in an Older Population with Asthma: A US Medicare Fee-for-Service Analysis.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Representation of Older Adult Patients in Clinical Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults remain significantly underrepresented in clinical trials. This is concerning because age-associated physiological changes can alter drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. This paper examines the status of older adult representation in clinical trials, analyzes contributing factors, and discusses initiatives to address gaps. Data were collected from studies completed between 2010 and 2025 using ClinicalTrials.gov to assess age-related inclusion/exclusion criteria. Further, two surveys of pharmaceutical companies were initially conducted to assess age ranges of randomized patients in pivotal trials, what clinical pharmacology approaches were applied to potentially support dosing in older adult patients, whether exclusion criteria disproportionally excluded older patients, reasons older adult patients were not randomized, and whether older patients more often discontinued trials prematurely. Exclusion criterion based on an age cut-off was rarely applied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed for most trials, but only one age-related dosing recommendation was reported out of 29 products. In a survey of 41 clinical studies, exclusion criteria showed no bias toward exclusion of patients > 80 years. Reasons for not randomizing older patients were diverse and trial dependent. Subjective reasons for non-randomization at higher frequencies in older patients were patient wish and doctor advice. Discontinuation rate did not reveal a clear age-related trend. When comparing trial age composition to disease prevalence by age, a mismatch was evident with fewer than expected older patients enrolled. This research identifies the gap between trial participation and disease prevalence by age groups, offering insights for sponsor companies to enhance older adults' inclusion in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.