ArticleHealth promotion international2025
University student mental health before and after implementation of a mental health strategy: a repeated cross-sectional study from Australia.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies have consistently indicated that university students are at risk of experiencing poor mental health. This study analysed survey waves at an Australian university in 2019 and 2022 preceding and following implementation of a student mental health strategy to evaluate progress on supporting student mental health. Key indicators for mental health and wellbeing; diversity and inclusion; and risk and protective factors for psychological distress were assessed. Regression analyses examined change between survey waves and risk and protective factors within waves. For mental health measures, the findings demonstrate that in 2022 more students found university stressful while no improvement was seen for risk of mental illness, wellbeing, and coping. Students were also less able to identify a mental health problem, more likely to deal with a mental health problem alone, and less aware of the confidentiality of university-based health services. However, help seeking intention increased and diversity and inclusion indicators improved with more students feeling included and accepted. Risk and protective factors were generally consistent across waves with elevated risks associated with non-Australian country of birth, LGBTQI+ status, current health condition, and current financial stress. Protective factors were age, social inclusion, social acceptance, and satisfaction. Limited progress on key indicators may be due to the COVID-19 pandemic and deterioration in economic conditions. The findings suggest universities can support student mental health by making students feel included, accepted, and satisfied, but that universities should also consider how to address the broader social and economic pressures that students face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.