Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230911›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Contrast negation increases face pareidolia rates in natural scenes.

Benjamin Balas, Myra Morton, Molly Setchfield, Lily Roshau, Emily Westrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin BalasPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Myra MortonPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Molly SetchfieldPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Lily RoshauPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Emily WestrickPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face pareidolia, the phenomenon of seeing face-like patterns in non-face images, has a dual nature: Pareidolic patterns are experienced as face-like, even while observers can recognize the true nature of the stimulus (Stuart et al., 2025). Although pareidolic faces seem to result largely from the canonical arrangement of eye spots and a mouth, we hypothesized that competition between veridical and face-like interpretations of pareidolic patterns may constrain face pareidolia in natural scenes and textures. Specifically, we predicted that contrast negation, which disrupts multiple aspects of mid- to high-level recognition, may increase rates of face pareidolia in complex natural textures by weakening the veridical, non-face stimulus interpretation. We presented adult participants (n = 27) and 5- to 12-year-old children (n = 67) with a series of natural images depicting textures such as grass, leaves, shells, and rocks. We asked participants to circle any patterns in each image that looked face-like, with no constraints on response time or pattern size, position, and orientation. We found that, across our adult and child samples, contrast-negated images yielded more pareidolic face detections than positive images. We conclude that disrupting veridical object and texture recognition enhances pareidolia in children and adults by compromising half of the dual nature of a pareidolic pattern.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityFacial RecognitionPattern Recognition, VisualAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41230911
PMCPMC12617666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.