ArticleJournal of vision2025
Disentangling decision uncertainty and motor noise in curved movement trajectories.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a manual reaching target is selected from a number of alternatives, decision uncertainty can often result in curvature of movement trajectories toward a nonchosen alternative. This curvature in the two-dimensional object plane is typically attributed to competitive interactions between different movement goals. Several models of action selection assume an explicit link between the momentary position of the hand and the state of the underlying decision process. Under this assumption, tracking the position of the hand can be used to infer the temporal evolution of the decision. However, even without a selection requirement, movements show variable amounts of curvature due to motor noise. We assessed the relative contributions of decision uncertainty and motor noise to the variability in curvature in naturalistic reach-to-grasp actions. Participants had to pick up one of two blocks (the brighter/dimmer block) and we manipulated decision uncertainty by varying the luminance difference between the two blocks. Single target baseline reaches were included to model the variability in curvature without a choice requirement. We assessed to what extent this baseline model can account for the curvature distributions observed under choice conditions, and tested several modifications of the model to capture any effects of decision uncertainty. The best model of the curvature distributions under choice conditions involved a mixture of the baseline component along with a separate choice component. The weight of this choice component and analysis of the likelihood of observed reaches under the choice/baseline components, suggest that the majority of reaches were unaffected by decision uncertainty and were compatible with the natural variability in movement trajectories due to motor noise. Unless the variability induced by factors unrelated to the decision process is adequately accounted for, the role of decision uncertainty may be overstated when it is inferred from reach trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.