Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230909›Full record

Trial reportJournal of vision2025

Allocentric spatial representations dominate when switching between real and virtual worlds.

Meaghan McManus, Franziska Seifert, Immo Schütz, Katja Fiehler

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meaghan McManusExperimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Franziska SeifertExperimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Immo SchützExperimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Katja FiehlerExperimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After removing a virtual reality headset, people can be surprised to find that they are facing a different direction than expected. Here, we investigated if people can maintain spatial representations of one environment while immersed in another. In the first three experiments, stationary participants were asked to point to previously seen targets in one environment, either the real world or a virtual environment, while in the other environment. We varied the amount of misalignment between the two environments (detectable or undetectable), the virtual environment itself (lab or kitchen), and the instructions (general or egocentric priming). Pointing endpoints were based primarily on the locations of objects in the currently seen environment, suggesting a strong reliance on allocentric cues. In the fourth experiment, participants moved in virtual reality while keeping track of an unseen real-world target. We confirmed that the pointing errors were due to a reliance on the currently seen environment. It appears that people hardly ever keep track of object positions in a previously seen environment and instead primarily rely on currently available spatial information to plan their actions.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionSpatial BehaviorVirtual RealityAdultCuesFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSpatial MemoryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41230909
PMCPMC12629136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.