Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230825›Full record

ArticleLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2025

Clinical Perspectives on Long-Term Albumin Therapy in Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Delphi Survey in Spain-The ALBA Study.

Jose Ignacio Fortea, Diego Rincon Rodríguez, Agustín Albillos, Elsa Solá Vergés, Rafael Bañares

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. [Clinical research progress in 2025 for hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Clinical Perspectives on Long-Term Albumin Therapy in Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Delphi Survey in Spain-The ALBA Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose Ignacio ForteaGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Clinical and Translational Research in Digestive Diseases, Valdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5255-9445
Diego Rincon RodríguezLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4470-7724
Agustín AlbillosGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERehd, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9131-2592
Elsa Solá VergésDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Rafael BañaresLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-8437

Funding

European Regional Development FundGrifolsInstituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/01258Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI21/01957Spanish Association for Study of the Liver
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlbumin is well established for some acute indications in decompensated cirrhosis, but its long-term use remains controversial. The ALBA study explored expert clinical perspectives, barriers, and current practices regarding long-term albumin therapy in Spain.

methodsA two-round national Delphi study was conducted among 47 hepatology experts from Spanish hospitals with broad geographic coverage. The survey included 40 Delphi statements and 14 items on opinion, attitude, and behaviour across five domains. Consensus was defined as Tastle's coefficient ≥ 0.8. Items with moderate consensus (0.7-0.79) and < 70% agreement, or < 0.7, were re-evaluated in round two.

resultsLong-term albumin was reportedly used in 25.5% of centers. However, panellists broadly supported its potential benefit in preventing ascites-related complications and endorsed its use regardless of transplant eligibility. It was prioritised for patients with difficult-to-control ascites (89.3%) and renal impairment (55.2%), though benefits were perceived as lower in late-stage disease. Day hospitals were seen as the most appropriate setting, despite strain. Main barriers included evidentiary limitations, institutional logistics, and pharmacy restrictions. Therapy was viewed as overall safe, with dose-dependent cardiac risk, and considered cost-effective. Strong support was expressed for a national registry to guide implementation.

conclusionsPanellists considered long-term albumin administration to be clinically beneficial and prioritised its use for patients with advanced-stage disease, regardless of transplant candidacy. However, integration into routine practice remains limited due to a lack of robust supporting evidence, along with institutional and logistical barriers. A national registry and targeted strategies to optimise use and resource allocation were endorsed.

Indexed as

AscitesLiver CirrhosisSerum Albumin, HumanAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelConsensusCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDelphi TechniqueDuration of TherapyFemaleHealth Care RationingHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedSerum Albumin, Humanasciteshealth care surveysliver cirrhosisportal hypertensionserum albumin

Identifiers

PMID41230825
PMCPMC12613793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.