ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Low genetic differentiation among morphologically distinct Cycas species informs the delineation of conservation management units.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCycads are the most threatened group of seed plants, with isolation and habitat fragmentation among the primary drivers of species decline. Understanding how genetic diversity is distributed across populations is crucial for informing conservation management and identifying genetically vulnerable populations that require conservation attention.
methodsHere we investigated the genetic diversity and structure of two endemic Australian species of significant conservation concern, Cycas armstrongii and C. maconochiei subsp. maconochiei. Two hundred and thirty-six individuals were sampled from 26 populations across their native ranges, including a presumed putative hybrid population (C. armstrongii × maconochiei), utilizing next-generation sequencing in the form of restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq). KEY
resultsOur results suggested low levels of genetic diversity in both taxa (C. armstrongii, He ≤ 0.038; C. maconochiei subsp. maconochiei, He ≤ 0.061) and no evidence for inbreeding (mean GIS -0.143 and -0.153, respectively). Analysis of molecular variance indicated minimal genetic differentiation between populations (2.41 %) and between taxa (1.81 %). However, pairwise FST values and the Mantel test revealed significant isolation by distance (r = 0.606, P < 0.0001). Discriminant analysis of principal components and popuatlion STRUCTURE analysis indicated admixture, between populations. Morphological traits, principal component and environmental analysis based on seven traits found significant differentiation in five characters, four of which were environmentally linked. The results showed no clear signal of interspecific hybridization for either taxon.
conclusionsThese findings indicate C. armstrongii and C. maconochiei subsp. maconochiei likely represent a morphologically variable species. In addition to updating the threat assessment, we recommend: (1) formally recognizing genetically depauperate or geographically isolated populations (e.g. Tiwi Islands) as conservation management units (CMUs); (2) establishing new ex situ assurance collections for at-risk CMUs; and (3) implementing assisted gene flow among genetically compatible populations to enhance adaptive potential. These actions will ensure conservation strategies are tailored to evolutionary and ecological units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.