Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230662›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

The Credibility of Bioethics After the Gaza Genocide.

Maide Barış, Hossein Dabbagh, Mohammad Sharif Razai, Mehmet İnanç Özekmekçi, Arianne Shahvisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maide BarışDepartment of Medical History and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7445-4599
Hossein DabbaghDepartment of Philosophy, Northeastern University London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9986-2433
Mohammad Sharif RazaiPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6671-5557
Mehmet İnanç ÖzekmekçiDepartment of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-6664
Arianne ShahvisiBrighton and Sussex Medical School, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-7566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between October 2023 and January 2025, the Israeli military's sustained attacks on Gaza resulted in an estimated 186,000 deaths and the systematic destruction of healthcare infrastructure. Despite the professed commitment to human dignity, justice, and the minimization of suffering within bioethics, major institutions and scholars in the field have largely remained silent or selectively engaged with the crisis. This paper argues that the Gaza genocide exposes a deeper crisis within bioethics: its growing detachment from urgent, real-world ethical challenges. Such detachment erodes public trust and raises fundamental questions about the discipline's relevance and credibility. The article interrogates the possible reasons and motivations for the silence and disengagement in the face of genocide in Gaza, and examines the institutional and disciplinary responsibilities that bioethics bears in response to health-destroying state violence. Framing the inaction as a moral failure with far-reaching implications, the article proposes alternative routes of ethical engagement and outlines steps toward a more inclusive and responsive bioethics. It calls for the urgent reorientation of the field toward a justice-driven, politically conscious practice capable of confronting today's most pressing ethical issues.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesBioethicsGenocideSocial JusticeHuman RightsHumansIsraelMiddle EastbioethicsGaza–Israel wargenocidepolitical influencewar

Identifiers

PMID41230662
PMCPMC13570741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.